Place attachment and natural hazard risk: Research review and agenda

Little is known about how place attachment affects natural hazard risk perception and coping. A systematic search of social science databases revealed 31 works (1996–2016) that directly address place attachment in relation to natural hazard risk or natural environmental risks (seismic, volcanic, etc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of environmental psychology Vol. 48; pp. 33 - 53
Main Authors Bonaiuto, Marino, Alves, Susana, De Dominicis, Stefano, Petruccelli, Irene
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier India Pvt Ltd 01.12.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Little is known about how place attachment affects natural hazard risk perception and coping. A systematic search of social science databases revealed 31 works (1996–2016) that directly address place attachment in relation to natural hazard risk or natural environmental risks (seismic, volcanic, etc.). Across different contexts, the research shows: (a) both positive and negative relations between place attachment and natural environmental risk perception; (b) both positive and negative relations between place attachment and risk coping; and (c) mediating and moderating relations. In particular, results show that: (a) strongly attached individuals perceive natural environmental risks but underestimate their potential effects; (b) strongly attached individuals are unwilling to relocate when facing natural environmental risks and are more likely to return to risky areas after a natural environmental disaster; (c) place attachment acts both as a mediating and moderating variable between risk perception and coping. Place attachment should play a more significant role in natural hazard risk management.
ISSN:0272-4944
1522-9610
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.007