When Do Voters Sanction Corrupt Politicians?

A growing body of research explores the factors that affect when corrupt politicians are held accountable by voters. Most studies, however, focus on one or few factors in isolation, leaving incomplete our understanding of whether they condition each other. To address this, we embedded rich conjoint...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of experimental political science Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 161 - 171
Main Authors Klašnja, Marko, Lupu, Noam, Tucker, Joshua A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.01.2021
Subjects
Bribery
Corruption
Corruption in government
Election results
Experiments
Offenses
Partisanship
Political science
Politicians
Politics
Polls & surveys
Punishment
Research Article
Sanctions
Voters
Chile
Uruguay
Argentina
survey experiment
Argentina
Uruguay
voting
Chile
corruption
conjoint
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:A growing body of research explores the factors that affect when corrupt politicians are held accountable by voters. Most studies, however, focus on one or few factors in isolation, leaving incomplete our understanding of whether they condition each other. To address this, we embedded rich conjoint candidate choice experiments into surveys in Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. We test the importance of two contextual factors thought to mitigate voters’ punishment of corrupt politicians: how widespread corruption is and whether it brings side benefits. Like other scholars, we find that corruption decreases candidate support substantially. But, we also find that information that corruption is widespread does not lessen the sanction applied against corruption, whereas information about the side benefits from corruption does, and does so to a similar degree as the mitigating role of permissible attitudes toward bribery. Moreover, those who stand to gain from these side benefits are less likely to sanction corruption.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2052-2630
2052-2649
DOI:10.1017/XPS.2020.13