Explanatory coherence and empirical adequacy: The problem of abduction, and the justification of evolutionary models
Foundationalist theories of justification for science were undermined by the theory-ladeness thesis, which has affinities with coherentist epistemologies. A challenge for defenders of coherentist theories of scientific justification is to specify coherence relations relevant to science and to show h...
Saved in:
| Published in | Biology & philosophy Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 513 - 527 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Dordrecht
Springer Nature B.V
01.09.2003
|
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Summary: | Foundationalist theories of justification for science were undermined by the theory-ladeness thesis, which has affinities with coherentist epistemologies. A challenge for defenders of coherentist theories of scientific justification is to specify coherence relations relevant to science and to show how these relations make the truth of their bearers likely. Coherence relations include characteristics that pick out better explanations in the implementation of abductive arguments. Empiricist philosophers have attacked abductive reasoning by claiming that explanatory virtues are pragmatic, having no implications regarding truth. However, empiricist's basic beliefs are subject to the same challenges facing abduction, both of which can be met by citing causally coherent etiologies, which are commonplace in biological explanations, and by demonstrating the relevance of causal coherence to truth.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0169-3867 1572-8404 |
| DOI: | 10.1023/A:1025523022460 |