The Institutional Dimensions of Fisheries Stock Assessments

Coastal states were granted ample authority to conserve and manage resources within their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) as a result of the codification of 200-mile exclusive economic zones at the Third Law of the Sea Convention. With this authority came the responsibility to acquire a scientific u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational environmental agreements : politics, law and economics Vol. 4; no. 2; pp. 129 - 141
Main Author Alcock, Frank
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Nature B.V 2004
Subjects
1130
8400
9130
9172
9179
9190
Agriculture industry
Asia & the Pacific
Australia
Canada
Coastal fisheries
Credibility
Economic theory
Exclusive economic zone
Experimental/theoretical
Fisheries
Fishery economics
Fishery policy
Interest groups
Legitimacy
Maritime law
Stakeholders
Studies
Sustainable development
United States
Australia
Canada
United States > US
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Coastal states were granted ample authority to conserve and manage resources within their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) as a result of the codification of 200-mile exclusive economic zones at the Third Law of the Sea Convention. With this authority came the responsibility to acquire a scientific understanding of these resources sufficient to inform sustainable policies. Two decades later, it would appear that the transmission of scientifically sound advice into long-term sustainable policies has proved more difficult than anticipated. This paper examines the linkage between fisheries stock assessments and fisheries policy and argues that institutional structure affects perceptions of salience, credibility and legitimacy and, as a result, the influence of fisheries stock assessments on fisheries policy. More specifically, I argue here that fisheries stock assessment processes that are embedded within policymaking organizations are more influential within those organizations than outside of them. Conversely, autonomous assessments are more influential than embedded assessments with a broad range of stakeholders affected by fisheries policies but less influential within the policymaking organizations themselves. The empirical illustrations of these points include an examination of fisheries stock assessments in Canada, the United States and Australia. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1567-9764
1573-1553
DOI:10.1023/B:INEA.0000040416.45027.e4