Efficacy of the Nav1.7 blocker PF-05089771 in a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical study in subjects with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy

The effect of PF-05089771, a selective, peripherally restricted Na v 1.7 sodium channel blocker on pain due to diabetic peripheral neuropathy was investigated in a randomised, placebo and active-controlled parallel group clinical trial (NCT02215252). A 1-week placebo-run in the period was followed b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPain (Amsterdam) Vol. 159; no. 8; pp. 1465 - 1476
Main Authors McDonnell, Aoibhinn, Collins, Susie, Ali, Zahid, Iavarone, Laura, Surujbally, Raulin, Kirby, Simon, Butt, Richard P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wolters Kluwer 01.08.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The effect of PF-05089771, a selective, peripherally restricted Na v 1.7 sodium channel blocker on pain due to diabetic peripheral neuropathy was investigated in a randomised, placebo and active-controlled parallel group clinical trial (NCT02215252). A 1-week placebo-run in the period was followed by a 4-week treatment period and a 1-week placebo run-out/taper-down period. Single-blind placebo was administered throughout run-in and run-out periods. Subjects were randomised to receive either PF-05089771 150 mg twice daily, pregabalin 150 mg twice daily, or placebo during the 4-week treatment period. One hundred thirty-five subjects were randomised. The primary endpoint was the average pain score derived from subjects' Numerical Rating Scale scores over the past 7 days of week 4 of the double-blind treatment period. Predefined efficacy criteria for the trial were the effect of PF-05089771 being >0.5 units better than placebo at interim analysis after completion of the first part of the study. Although a trend for a reduction in the weekly average pain score in the PF-05089771 treatment group was observed, this was not statistically significant when compared with placebo at week 4, with a mean posterior difference of −0.41 (90% credible interval: −1.00 to 0.17). The effect of PF-05089771 was smaller than that seen with pregabalin, which was statistically significant when compared with placebo at week 4, with a mean posterior difference of −0.53 (90% credible interval: −0.91 to −0.20). As predefined efficacy criteria were not met, the study did not proceed to the second part. PF-05089771 was well tolerated. Possible reasons for the modest efficacy observed with PF-05089771 are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0304-3959
1872-6623
1872-6623
DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001227