Family planning influences and perceptions among dermatology residents from ACGME-accredited training programs: a survey-based study

• Published in: Archives of dermatological research Vol. 316; no. 5; p. 159
• Main Authors: Humphrey, Victoria S., Wyant, W. Austin, Brag, Katherine O.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 11.05.2024
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Cryopreservation; Dermatology; Dermatology - education; Family Planning Services - statistics & numerical data; Female; Fertility Preservation - psychology; Fertility Preservation - statistics & numerical data; Humans; Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Parental Leave - statistics & numerical data; Pilot Projects; Pregnancy; Short Report; Surveys and Questionnaires - statistics & numerical data
• ISSN: 1432-069X; 1432-069X
• DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-02882-9

As an increasing number of women pursue careers in dermatology, the structure and culture of training must reflect the evolving needs of dermatology residents. To examine perceived barriers to and perceptions of family planning amongst dermatology residents capable of becoming pregnant, evidence-based principles were employed to develop a 40-question survey for dermatology residents in ACGME-accredited training programs. A pilot study was conducted with the Harvard Combined Dermatology Residency Training Program residents before full-scale national electronic survey distribution from April to June 2023. Information was collected regarding factors influencing attitudes towards becoming pregnant during residency, as well as information regarding residency program family leave, fertility preservation, and lactation policies. Ultimately, 95 dermatology residents capable of becoming pregnant completed the survey. The majority (77.9%) of respondents reported intentionally delaying having children because of their careers, and 73.7% believed there is a negative stigma attached to being pregnant or having children during dermatology residency. Of respondents who had not yet attempted to become pregnant, 75.3% were concerned about the possibility of future infertility. Of the 60% of respondents considering fertility preservation options, 84.6% noted concerns about these procedures being cost-prohibitive on a resident salary. Only 2% of respondents reported that cryopreservation was fully covered through their residency benefits, while 20% reported partial coverage. Reported program parental leave policies varied considerably with 54.9%, 25.4%, 1.4%, and 18.3% of residents reporting 4–6 weeks, 7–8 weeks, 9–10 weeks, and 11 + weeks of available leave, respectively. Notably, 53.5% of respondents reported that vacation or sick days must be used for parental leave. Respondents reported lactation policies and on-site childcare at 49.5% and 8.4% of residency programs, respectively. The trends noted in the survey responses signal concerning aspects of family planning and fertility for dermatology residents capable of becoming pregnant. Residency family planning policies, benefits, and resources should evolve and homogenize across programs to fully support trainees.