A research and development roadmap to support applications of the enhanced BIOMASS methodology

• Published in: Journal of radiological protection Vol. 42; no. 2; pp. 20508 - 20521
• Main Authors: Thorne, M C, Lindborg, T, Brown, J, Ikonen, A T K, Smith, G M, Smith, K, Walke, R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England IOP Publishing 26.04.2022
• Subjects: assessment methodology; BIOMASS; biosphere; Radioactive Waste - analysis; Radioactivity; Refuse Disposal; roadmap; solid waste disposal; assessment methodology; roadmap; solid waste disposal; biosphere; BIOMASS
• ISSN: 0952-4746; 1361-6498
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac66a3

The International Atomic Energy Agency has coordinated an international project addressing enhancements of methods for modelling the biosphere in post-closure safety assessments of solid radioactive waste disposal. This has resulted in the enhanced BIOMASS methodology that is described elsewhere in this special issue. To a large degree, the enhancements to the BIOMASS methodology arose from experience gained in applying the original methodology, both in the context of other international projects and in assessments of existing or proposed disposal facilities for solid radioactive wastes. Here, this experience is used, together with information on the status of solid radioactive waste disposal programmes worldwide, to identify opportunities for applying the enhanced methodology and for learning from those applications. This provides a basis for identifying research and development to support application of the enhanced methodology in a variety of environmental settings. These research and development requirements include aspects related to climate change under a variety of forcing scenarios, landform development in climatic regimes ranging from cold, polar to arid, tropical, modelling of groundwater flow and contaminant transport in surface-water catchments where both fractured rock and porous sediments are present, and studies of the transport of key radioisotopes of elements central to major biogeochemical cycles, such as those of carbon, chlorine, sulphur and iodine. In addition, some remarks are made on aspects of the application of the enhanced methodology that could imply review and updating of regulations and regulatory guidance, e.g. in relation to the definition of representative persons or groups to be considered in assessments and in respect of approaches to the assessment of radiological impacts on non-human biota. Furthermore, consideration is given as to how the scientific and technical experience that has been gained and methods that have been developed in the context of solid radioactive disposal facilities could support management of contaminated sites and legacy facilities that are likely to require long-term management and stewardship.