The Comparative Peripheral Anticholinergic-Like Adverse Event Profiles of Olanzapine and Risperidone

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that reported in vitro muscarinic receptor affinity differences between olanzapine and risperidone would be reflected in peripheral solicited anticholinergic adverse event frequencies. METHOD: Data from a double-blind, randomized trial of olanzapine versus risperido...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPrimary care companion for CNS disorders Vol. 2; no. 4; pp. 122 - 126
Main Authors Kennedy, John S., Bymaster, Frank P., Basson, Bruce R., Gilmore, Julie A., Tran, Pierre V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc 01.08.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that reported in vitro muscarinic receptor affinity differences between olanzapine and risperidone would be reflected in peripheral solicited anticholinergic adverse event frequencies. METHOD: Data from a double-blind, randomized trial of olanzapine versus risperidone in 339 patients (age range, 18-65 years) with DSM-IV schizophrenia spectrum acute psychosis were retrospectively analyzed. Subgroups based on the median of the mean daily drug dose were constructed (olanzapine </= 17 mg; olanzapine > 17 mg; risperidone </= 6 mg; risperidone > 6 mg). Mean daily dose of adjunctive anticholinergic medication was compared using ANOVA, and frequencies of treatment-emergent solicited adverse events defined by the Association de Méthodologie et de Documentation en Psychiatrie (AMDP-5) were analyzed using categorical methods. RESULTS: Mean daily anticholinergic dose was significantly higher overall for the risperidone group (0.68 +/- 1.27 mg) than for the olanzapine group (0.27 +/- 0.76 mg) (p =.002). When only patients who did not receive anticholinergic adjunct therapy were considered, no significant differences in the frequency of specific anticholinergic adverse events occurred in olanzapine-treated patients as compared with risperidone-treated patients (p >/=.245). There was also no significant difference between olanzapine and risperidone in the frequency of any anticholinergic adverse event (p =.458). CONCLUSION: At clinically effective doses, olanzapine and risperidone did not differ significantly in frequency of peripheral anticholinergic events. These results support the view that, for olanzapine and risperidone, in vitro anticholinergic receptor binding (K(i) values) may not predict in vivo peripheral events.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reprint requests to: John S. Kennedy, M.D., Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Drop Code 4133, Indianapolis, IN 46285.
ISSN:1523-5998
2155-7780
2155-7780
DOI:10.4088/PCC.v02n0403