Operator Hölder–Zygmund functions

It is well known that a Lipschitz function on the real line does not have to be operator Lipschitz. We show that the situation changes dramatically if we pass to Hölder classes. Namely, we prove that if f belongs to the Hölder class Λ α ( R ) with 0 < α < 1 , then ‖ f ( A ) − f ( B ) ‖ ⩽ const...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvances in mathematics (New York. 1965) Vol. 224; no. 3; pp. 910 - 966
Main Authors Aleksandrov, A.B., Peller, V.V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.06.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is well known that a Lipschitz function on the real line does not have to be operator Lipschitz. We show that the situation changes dramatically if we pass to Hölder classes. Namely, we prove that if f belongs to the Hölder class Λ α ( R ) with 0 < α < 1 , then ‖ f ( A ) − f ( B ) ‖ ⩽ const ‖ A − B ‖ α for arbitrary self-adjoint operators A and B. We prove a similar result for functions f in the Zygmund class Λ 1 ( R ) : for arbitrary self-adjoint operators A and K we have ‖ f ( A − K ) − 2 f ( A ) + f ( A + K ) ‖ ⩽ const ‖ K ‖ . We also obtain analogs of this result for all Hölder–Zygmund classes Λ α ( R ) , α > 0 . Then we find a sharp estimate for ‖ f ( A ) − f ( B ) ‖ for functions f of class Λ ω = def { f : ω f ( δ ) ⩽ const ω ( δ ) } for an arbitrary modulus of continuity ω. In particular, we study moduli of continuity, for which ‖ f ( A ) − f ( B ) ‖ ⩽ const ω ( ‖ A − B ‖ ) for self-adjoint A and B, and for an arbitrary function f in Λ ω . We obtain similar estimates for commutators f ( A ) Q − Q f ( A ) and quasicommutators f ( A ) Q − Q f ( B ) . Finally, we estimate the norms of finite differences ∑ j = 0 m ( − 1 ) m − j ( m j ) f ( A + j K ) for f in the class Λ ω , m that is defined in terms of finite differences and a modulus continuity ω of order m. We also obtain similar results for unitary operators and for contractions.
ISSN:0001-8708
1090-2082
DOI:10.1016/j.aim.2009.12.018