Buckling of externally pressurized cylindrical shell: A comparison of theoretical and experimental data
This study examined the buckling of unstiffened cylindrical shells under external pressure. Six stainless steel cylindrical shell specimens were tested, with a length-to-radius ratio, L/R, ranging from 1 to 7. The wall thickness, diameter, axial length, and geometry of each specimen and the material...
Saved in:
Published in | Thin-walled structures Vol. 129; pp. 309 - 316 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.08.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study examined the buckling of unstiffened cylindrical shells under external pressure. Six stainless steel cylindrical shell specimens were tested, with a length-to-radius ratio, L/R, ranging from 1 to 7. The wall thickness, diameter, axial length, and geometry of each specimen and the material properties of the corresponding sheets were measured. All cylindrical specimens were subjected to external pressure in a pressure chamber; the buckling load and final collapsed mode were recorded. This paper presents a comparison among theoretical calculations, finite element (FE) results, and experimental data for externally pressurized cylindrical shells. In the numerical calculations, true geometry, average wall thicknesses, and elastic–perfectly plastic modeling were considered. Deviation between theoretical and FE results was 0%to − 22%, and it increased with the length-to-radius ratio. Experimental results are consistent with FE results, with deviation of 2–9%, and final collapsed modes of all shells are consistent.
•Theoretical, numerical and experimental buckling analysis of cylindrical shells.•Numerical analysis with true geometry and elastic–perfectly plastic modeling.•The numerical of cylindrical shells agree well with experimental.•Proposed a simple test for cylindrical shells subjected to externally compression. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0263-8231 1879-3223 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.tws.2018.04.016 |