Subjecthood and linear order in linguistic encoding: Evidence from the real-time production of wh-questions in English and Mandarin Chinese

•First cross-linguistic, real-time investigation of wh-questions during production.•The subject is linguistically encoded first, even when it is not linearly initial.•Assignment of grammatical role and linear order is tightly linked temporally. We use visual world eye-tracking to provide a first loo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of memory and language Vol. 105; pp. 60 - 75
Main Authors Do, Monica L., Kaiser, Elsi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.04.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0749-596X
1096-0821
DOI10.1016/j.jml.2018.11.001

Cover

More Information
Summary:•First cross-linguistic, real-time investigation of wh-questions during production.•The subject is linguistically encoded first, even when it is not linearly initial.•Assignment of grammatical role and linear order is tightly linked temporally. We use visual world eye-tracking to provide a first look into the real-time production of an under-researched but communicatively crucial construction – wh-questions. We investigate whether the transition from abstract message to highly-structured utterances (linguistic encoding) is driven by linear order (positional processing) or subjecthood assignment (functional processing). Experiment 1 decouples positional and functional processes by comparing production of English declaratives versus object wh-questions (‘Which nurses did the maids tickle?’). Experiment 2 compares the production of declaratives versus object wh-questions in Mandarin Chinese to investigate potential information-focus effects on linguistic encoding and tests whether Experiment 1’s findings could be due to focus. Experiment 1 found that even though the articulation of a sentence is necessarily linear, speakers do not necessarily encode sentences in accordance with the linear order in which the words are uttered. Experiment 2 suggests that information-focus does not guide speakers' eye-movements during linguistic encoding.
ISSN:0749-596X
1096-0821
DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2018.11.001