Individual differences in the algebraic structure of preferences

Two divergent theories regarding the algebraic structure of preferences are the strict weak-order (i.e., utility) representation, and the lexicographic semiorder representation. We carry out a novel comparison of these theories by formulating them as mixture models of ternary choice that are general...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of mathematical psychology Vol. 66; pp. 70 - 82
Main Authors Davis-Stober, Clintin P., Brown, Nicholas, Cavagnaro, Daniel R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.06.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two divergent theories regarding the algebraic structure of preferences are the strict weak-order (i.e., utility) representation, and the lexicographic semiorder representation. We carry out a novel comparison of these theories by formulating them as mixture models of ternary choice that are general yet parsimonious. We apply Bayesian model selection to see which representation (if any) best explains each decision maker’s choices across multiple data sets. We report the results of a new experiment, which tests the robustness of each representation with respect to manipulations of stimuli, display format, and time pressure. We find that a majority of participants are best described by strict weak-ordered preferences with a substantial minority best described by lexicographically semi-ordered preferences. •We examine the algebraic structure of individual preference.•We evaluate a large class of weak-order and lexicographic semiorder based theories.•We present a new study as well as a re-analysis of an existing data set.•We find that a majority of subjects’ preferences are consistent with weak orders.•We find that the remaining subjects are well-described by lexicographic semiorders.
ISSN:0022-2496
1096-0880
DOI:10.1016/j.jmp.2014.12.003