Growth and defects of GaAs and InGaAs films on porous GaAs substrates

We investigated the opportunities to increase the electric uniformity of GaAs and InGaAs films grown by molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) technique on monocrystalline (single crystal) GaAs: both on porous and conventional so-called “monolithic” (without pores) GaAs (100) substrates. The basic attention w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThin solid films Vol. 515; no. 10; pp. 4445 - 4449
Main Authors Buzynin, Alexander N., Buzynin, Yury N., Belyaev, Alexander V., Luk'yanov, Albert E., Rau, Eduard I.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 26.03.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We investigated the opportunities to increase the electric uniformity of GaAs and InGaAs films grown by molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) technique on monocrystalline (single crystal) GaAs: both on porous and conventional so-called “monolithic” (without pores) GaAs (100) substrates. The basic attention was given to study the electrically active defects in films by using scanning electron microscope (SEM) with new technique which is called “Rau-detector” [E.I. Rau, A.N. Zhukov and E.B. Yakimov, Solid-State Phenomena, 1998, v. 53–54, 327.]. We compared the main properties of epitaxial GaAs and InGaAs films grown on above mentioned substrates. The films grown on porous substrates had higher structural perfection including the following advantages: ( a) smoother surface due to lateral growth mechanism; ( b) less density of structural defects (without dislocation walls), the density of pyramidal defects was ∼ 2 × 10 5 cm − 2 as compared with the density 2 × 10 7 cm − 2 in the films grown on monolithic substrates; ( c) less electrical activity of various structural defects and increased electric uniformity of grown films. The electrical activity of defects in films grown on porous substrates was essentially lowered due to gettering properties of porous substrate.
ISSN:0040-6090
1879-2731
DOI:10.1016/j.tsf.2006.07.175