The magnetic non-hydrostatic shallow-water model

We consider the dynamics of a set of reduced equations describing the evolution of a magnetised, rotating stably stratified fluid layer, atop a stagnant dense, perfectly conducting layer. We consider two closely related models. In the first, the layer has, above it, relatively light fluid where the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of fluid mechanics Vol. 973
Main Authors Dritschel, David G., Tobias, Steven M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 17.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We consider the dynamics of a set of reduced equations describing the evolution of a magnetised, rotating stably stratified fluid layer, atop a stagnant dense, perfectly conducting layer. We consider two closely related models. In the first, the layer has, above it, relatively light fluid where the magnetic pressure is much larger than the gas pressure, and the magnetic field is largely force-free. In the second model, the magnetic field is constrained to lie within the dynamical layer by the implementation of a model diffusion operator for the magnetic field. The model derivation proceeds by assuming that the horizontal velocity and the horizontal magnetic field are independent of the vertical coordinate, whilst the vertical components in the layer have a linear dependence on height. The full system comprises evolution equations for the magnetic field, horizontal velocity and height field together with a linear elliptic equation for the vertically integrated non-hydrostatic pressure. In the magneto-hydrostatic limit, these equations simplify to equations of shallow-water type. Numerical solutions for both models are provided for the fiducial case of a Gaussian vortex interacting with a magnetic field. The solutions are shown to differ negligibly. We investigate how the interaction of the vortex changes in response to the magnetic Reynolds number ${Rm}$, the Rossby deformation radius $L_D$, and a Coriolis buoyancy frequency ratio $f/N$ measuring the significance of non-hydrostatic effects. The magneto-hydrostatic limit corresponds to $f/N\to 0$.
ISSN:0022-1120
1469-7645
DOI:10.1017/jfm.2023.746