Uni-axial behaviour of steel slag concrete-filled-steel-tube columns with external confinement

• Published in: Thin-walled structures Vol. 185; p. 110562
• Main Authors: Lai, M.H., Lin, Y.H., Jin, Y.Y., Fei, Q., Wang, Z.C., Ho, J.C.M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2023
• Subjects: Concrete-filled-steel-tube column; Confinement effect; External confinement; Load–strain model; Steel slag concrete; Steel slag concrete; Concrete-filled-steel-tube column; Confinement effect; External confinement; Load–strain model
• ISSN: 0263-8231; 1879-3223
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.110562

Using steel slag, a waste by-product in the steel industry to replace natural aggregates to produce concrete can offer a sustainable solution in mitigating the environmental problems due to huge depletion of natural aggregates and disposal of abundant slag. Extensive research studies revealed that steel slag concrete has superior strength and stiffness but may also cause unsoundness to concrete. To solve the problem, steel slag concrete-filled-steel-tube (SSCFST) column was proposed, in which the concrete’s expansion would activate larger confining stress, and thereby enhancing the overall behaviour of the column. A total of 18 traditional concrete-filled-steel-tube (CFST) and SSCFST column specimens with and without external confinement were prepared and tested under uni-axial compression. The major testing parameters were the steel tube diameter to thickness ratio, steel slag coarse/fine aggregate replacement ratio and spacing of external confinement. Results revealed that by replacing 50% natural coarse aggregate with steel slag coarse aggregate or 50% natural fine aggregate with steel slag fine aggregate, the compressive strength of steel slag concrete increased but the flowability decreased. Besides, SSCFST columns showed superior mechanical behaviour than traditional CFST columns. With external confinement, the strength and stiffness were further improved. Lastly, a load–strain model developed previously by the authors was adopted to predict the mechanical behaviour of traditional CFST and SSCFST columns. Good agreement has been obtained between predicted and experimental results for traditional CFST column while for SSCFST columns, the model under-estimated the axial load and over-estimated the absolute hoop strain at a given axial strain attributed to the change in the packing structure and possible expansion of steel slag concrete. •Steel slag concrete has better compressive strength but worse flowability than normal concrete.•The external bolted steel bands can delay the local buckling and increase the load-carrying capacity of CFST columns.•Steel slag CFST columns has better strength and stiffness enhancement than normal CFST columns.•A theoretical model developed previously was adopted to predict the axial load–strain behaviour of the specimens.