Spatial scales of population synchrony of two competing species: effects of harvesting and strength of competition

• Published in: Oikos Vol. 127; no. 10; pp. 1459 - 1470
• Main Authors: Jarillo, Javier, Sæther, Bernt‐Erik, Engen, Steinar, Cao, Francisco J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2018
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Background noise; Biological competition; Capacity; Climate change; Competition; Density dependence; Dependence; Dispersal; Dynamics; Ecosystems; Environmental changes; Exploitation; Fluctuations; Harvesting; Illustrations; Interspecific; Population; Population dynamics; population synchrony scale; Scaling; Spatial distribution; Species; Sustainable harvest; Vulnerability
• ISSN: 0030-1299; 1600-0706
• DOI: 10.1111/oik.05069

Theoretical analyses of single‐species models have revealed that the degree of synchrony in fluctuations of geographically separated populations increases with increasing spatial covariation in environmental fluctuations and increased interchange of individuals, but decreases with local strength of density dependence. Here we extend these results to include interspecific competition between two species as well as harvesting. We show that the effects of interspecific competition on the geographical scale of population synchrony are dependent on the pattern of spatial covariation of environmental variables. If the environmental noise is uncorrelated between the competing species, competition generally increases the spatial scale of population synchrony of both species. Otherwise, if the environmental noises are strongly correlated between species, competition generally increases the spatial scale of population synchrony of at least one, but also often of both species. The magnitude of these spatial scaling effects is, however, strongly influenced by the dispersal capacity of the two competing species. If the species are subject to proportional harvesting, this may synchronise population dynamics over large geographical areas, affecting the vulnerability of harvested species to environmental changes. However, the strength of interspecific competition may strongly modify this effect of harvesting on the spatial scale of population synchrony. For example, harvesting of one species may affect the spatial distribution of competing species that are not subject to harvesting. These analytical results provide an important illustration of the importance of applying an ecosystem rather than a single‐species perspective when developing harvest strategies for a sustainable management of exploited species.