Deterministic Guarantees for Burer‐Monteiro Factorizations of Smooth Semidefinite Programs

We consider semidefinite programs (SDPs) with equality constraints. The variable to be optimized is a positive semidefinite matrix X of size n. Following the Burer‐Monteiro approach, we optimize a factor Y of size n × p instead, such that X = YYT. This ensures positive semidefiniteness at no cost an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCommunications on pure and applied mathematics Vol. 73; no. 3; pp. 581 - 608
Main Authors Boumal, Nicolas, Voroninski, Vladislav, Bandeira, Afonso S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley and Sons, Limited 01.03.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We consider semidefinite programs (SDPs) with equality constraints. The variable to be optimized is a positive semidefinite matrix X of size n. Following the Burer‐Monteiro approach, we optimize a factor Y of size n × p instead, such that X = YYT. This ensures positive semidefiniteness at no cost and can reduce the dimension of the problem if p is small, but results in a nonconvex optimization problem with a quadratic cost function and quadratic equality constraints in Y. In this paper, we show that if the set of constraints on Y regularly defines a smooth manifold, then, despite nonconvexity, first‐ and second‐order necessary optimality conditions are also sufficient, provided p is large enough. For smaller values of p, we show a similar result holds for almost all (linear) cost functions. Under those conditions, a global optimum Y maps to a global optimum X = YYT of the SDP. We deduce old and new consequences for SDP relaxations of the generalized eigenvector problem, the trust‐region subproblem, and quadratic optimization over several spheres, as well as for the Max‐Cut and Orthogonal‐Cut SDPs, which are common relaxations in stochastic block modeling and synchronization of rotations. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:0010-3640
1097-0312
DOI:10.1002/cpa.21830