Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for small lung tumors with a moderate dose Favorable results and low toxicity

Background Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SBRT, SABR) is being increasingly applied because of its high local efficacy, e.g., for small lung tumors. However, the optimum dosage is still under discussion. Here, we report data on 45 lung lesions [non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or metasta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStrahlentherapie und Onkologie Vol. 189; no. 1; pp. 33 - 40
Main Authors Duncker-Rohr, V., Nestle, U., Momm, F., Prokic, V., Heinemann, F., Mix, M., Reusch, J., Messmer, M.-B., Marschner, N., Waller, C.F., Weber, W.A., Grosu, A.-L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SBRT, SABR) is being increasingly applied because of its high local efficacy, e.g., for small lung tumors. However, the optimum dosage is still under discussion. Here, we report data on 45 lung lesions [non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or metastases] in 39 patients treated between 2009 and 2010 by SABR. Patients and methods SABR was performed with total doses of 35 Gy (5 fractions) or 37.5 Gy (3 fractions) prescribed to the 60% isodose line encompassing the planning target volume. Three-monthly follow-up CT scans were supplemented by FDG-PET/CT if clinically indicated. Results The median follow-up was 17 months. Local progression-free survival rates were 90.5% (all patients), 95.0% (NSCLC), and 81.8% (metastases) at 1 year. At 2 years, the respective local progression-free survival rates were 80.5%, 95.0%, and 59.7%. Overall survival rates were 71.1% (all patients), 65.4% (NSCLC), and 83.3% (metastases) at 1 year. Overall survival rates at 2 years were 52.7%, 45.9%, and 66.7%, respectively. Acute side effects were mild. Conclusion With the moderate dose schedule used, well-tolerated SABR led to favorable local tumor control as in other published series. Standardization in reporting the dose prescription for SABR is needed to allow comparison of different series in order to determine optimum dosage.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0179-7158
1439-099X
DOI:10.1007/s00066-012-0224-y