Radiation-induced prostate swelling during SBRT of the prostate

• Published in: Acta oncologica Vol. 61; no. 6; pp. 698 - 704
• Main Authors: Vanhanen, Antti, Reinikainen, Petri, Kapanen, Mika
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis 03.06.2022
• Subjects: Humans; Male; MR-only; Pelvis; Prostate - diagnostic imaging; prostate swelling; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy; PTV margin; Radiosurgery - adverse effects; Radiosurgery - methods; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; SBRT of the prostate; prostate swelling; PTV margin; SBRT of the prostate; MR-only
• ISSN: 0284-186X; 1651-226X
• DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2022.2062682

Reduced planning target volume (PTV) margins are commonly used in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of the prostate. In addition, MR-only treatment planning is becoming more common in prostate radiotherapy and compared to CT-MRI-based contouring results in notable smaller clinical target volume (CTV). Tight PTV margins coupled with MR-only planning raise a concern whether the margins are adequate enough to cover possible volumetric changes of the prostate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the volumetric change of the prostate and its effect on PTV margin during 5x7.25 Gy SBRT of the prostate. Twenty patients were included in the study. Three MRI scans, first prior to treatment (baseline), second after third fraction (mid-treatment) and third after fifth fraction (end-treatment) were acquired for each patient. Prostate contours were delineated on each MRI scan and used to assess the prostate volume and maximum prostate diameter on left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) directions at baseline, mid- and end-treatment. Median (IQR) change in the prostate volume relative to the baseline was 12.0% (3.1, 17.7) and 9.2% (2.0, 18.9) at the mid- and end-treatment, respectively, and the change was statistically significant (p = 0.004 and p = 0.020, respectively). Compared to the baseline, median increase in the maximum LR, SI and AP prostate diameters were 0.8, 2.3 and 1.5 mm at mid-treatment, and 0.5, 2.5 and 2.3 mm at end-treatment, respectively. If prostate contouring is based solely on MRI (e.g., in MR-only protocol), additional margin of 1-2 mm should be considered to account for prostate swelling. The study is part of clinical trial NCT02319239.