Thickness dependence of microwave magnetic properties in electrodeposited Fe–Co soft magnetic films with in-plane anisotropy

In this work, the thickness effect of Fe 52Co 48 soft magnetic films with in-plane anisotropy on static and microwave magnetic properties was investigated. The hysteresis loop results indicated that the static in-plane uniaxial anisotropy field increased from almost 0–60 Oe with increasing film thic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysica. B, Condensed matter Vol. 407; no. 3; pp. 555 - 559
Main Authors Yang, Xu, Wei, Jian-Qiang, Li, Xing-Hua, Gong, Lu-Qian, Wang, Tao, Li, Fa-Shen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 01.02.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this work, the thickness effect of Fe 52Co 48 soft magnetic films with in-plane anisotropy on static and microwave magnetic properties was investigated. The hysteresis loop results indicated that the static in-plane uniaxial anisotropy field increased from almost 0–60 Oe with increasing film thickness from 100 to 540 nm and well-defined in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy can be obtained as the thickness reached 540 nm or larger. Based on Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert (LLG) equation, the microwave complex permeability spectra were analyzed and well fitted. The LLG curve-fitting results indicated that the initial permeability increased from 106 to 142 and the resonant frequency was shifted from 4.95 to 4.29 GHz as the film thickness was varied from 540 to 1500 nm. Moreover, it was found that there was a discrepancy between the static and the dynamically determined anisotropy field, which can be explained by introducing an additional effective isotropic ripple field. The decreased ripple field was suggested to result in a significant decrease of damping coefficient from 0.109 to 0.038.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0921-4526
1873-2135
DOI:10.1016/j.physb.2011.11.049