Beyond essentialism: Knowledge production in Southeast Asian social science

How do disciplines such as political science, public policy, and international relations understand, adapt to, and potentially reform gendered processes of knowledge production and dissemination? And within Asia, are there special or specific aspects of this question that merit closer consideration...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAsian politics & policy Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 161 - 163
Main Authors Shair‐Rosenfield, Sarah, Arugay, Aries A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2023
Subjects
Careers
Essentialism
International relations
Production
Public policy
Social sciences
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:How do disciplines such as political science, public policy, and international relations understand, adapt to, and potentially reform gendered processes of knowledge production and dissemination? And within Asia, are there special or specific aspects of this question that merit closer consideration and concern? We wanted to confront and engage with these questions regarding a particular aspect of how scholarly practices are gendered: the ways in which gender-based differences lead to biases in academic publishing and subsequent long-term career success. With a generous grant from the British Academy (grant number WW21100175), we convened a series of writing workshops for early career researchers (ECRs) in the social sciences from and based in Southeast Asia from 2021 to 2022.
Bibliography:Editors' Introduction
ISSN:1943-0779
1943-0787
DOI:10.1111/aspp.12695