Surgical instrument to improve implant positioning in orbital reconstruction: a feasibility study

• Published in: British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery Vol. 59; no. 7; pp. 826 - 830
• Main Authors: Schreurs, R., Dubois, L., Klop, C., Beenen, L.F.M., Habets, P.E.M.H., Maal, T.J.J., Becking, A.G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2021
• Subjects: Dentistry; instrument; instrument design; orbit; orbital reconstruction; instrument; instrument design; orbit; orbital reconstruction
• ISSN: 0266-4356; 1532-1940
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.02.023

Adequate positioning of an orbital implant during orbital reconstruction surgery is essential for restoration of the pre-traumatised anatomy, but visual appraisal of its position is limited by the keyhole access and protruding soft tissues. A positioning instrument that attaches to the implant was designed to provide feedback outside the orbit. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of placement with the instrument and compare it with the accuracy of placement by visual appraisal. Ten orbits in five human cadaver heads were reconstructed twice: once using visual appraisal and once using the instrument workflow. No significant improvement was found for the roll (5.8° vs 3.4°, respectively, p=0.16), pitch (2.1° vs 1.5°, p=0.56), or translation (2.9 mm vs 3.3 mm, p=0.77), but the yaw was significantly reduced if the instrument workflow was used (15.3° vs 2.9°, p=0.02). The workflow is associated with low costs and low logistical demands, and may prevent outliers in implant positioning in a clinical setting when intraoperative navigation or patient-specific implants are not available.