Effects of Conservation Practices on Soil Quality Compared with a Corn–Soybean Rotation on a Claypan Soil

Restoration of degraded lands by adoption of recommended conservation management practices can rehabilitate watersheds and lead to improving soil and water quality. The objective was to evaluate the effects of grass buffers (GBs), biomass crops (BCs), grass waterways (GWWs), agroforestry buffers (AB...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of environmental quality Vol. 48; no. 6; pp. 1694 - 1702
Main Authors Alagele, Salah M., Anderson, Stephen H., Udawatta, Ranjith P., Veum, Kristen S., Rankoth, Lalith M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc 01.11.2019
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Restoration of degraded lands by adoption of recommended conservation management practices can rehabilitate watersheds and lead to improving soil and water quality. The objective was to evaluate the effects of grass buffers (GBs), biomass crops (BCs), grass waterways (GWWs), agroforestry buffers (ABs), landscape positions, and distance from tree base for AB treatment on soil quality compared with row crop (RC) (corn [Zea mays L.]–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation) on claypan soils. Soil samples were taken from 10‐cm‐depth increments from the soil surface to 30 cm for GB, BC, GWW, and RC with three replicates. Soil samples were collected from summit, backslope, and footslope landscape positions. Samples were taken at 50‐ and 150‐cm distances from the tree base. β‐Glucosidase, β‐glucosaminidase, dehydrogenase, fluorescein diacetate hydrolase (FDA), soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), active carbon (AC), and water‐stable aggregates (WSA) were measured. Results showed that β‐glucosidase, β‐glucosaminidase, dehydrogenase, FDA, AC, WSA, and TN values were significantly greater (P < 0.01) for the GB, BC, GWW, and AB treatments than for the RC treatment. The first depth (0–10 cm) revealed the highest values for all soil quality parameters relative to second and third depths. The footslope landscape had the highest parameter values compared with summit and backslope positions. The 50‐cm distance of AB treatment had higher values than the 150‐cm distance for all measured parameters. Results showed that perennial vegetation practices enhanced soil quality by improving soil microbial activity and SOC. Core Ideas Permanent vegetative management (trees and grasses) enhanced soil quality. Perennial practices improved microbial activity and increased soil organic carbon. Perennial vegetative practices have agricultural and environmental significance. Establishing perennial practices is an effective approach to enhance soil quality.
Bibliography:Assigned to Associate Editor Ke Sun.
Supplemental material is available online for this article.
ISSN:0047-2425
1537-2537
DOI:10.2134/jeq2019.03.0121