Outcomes Assessment of Engineering Writing at the University of Washington

Effective writing skills are crucial for engineers, and engineering programs have always struggled with how to prepare their students for the writing they will do as professionals. Now, programs must also show the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) that they have clear educati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.) Vol. 91; no. 3; pp. 333 - 338
Main Authors Plumb, Carolyn, Scott, Cathie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Effective writing skills are crucial for engineers, and engineering programs have always struggled with how to prepare their students for the writing they will do as professionals. Now, programs must also show the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) that they have clear educational outcomes for engineering communication and have a process for assessing student performance on those outcomes. At the University of Washington, we have spent the last five years developing an outcomes‐based assessment program for engineering writing. In spring 2001, the first round of writing assessment was completed. The assessment indicated that most of our students are competent in the outcomes we have developed. It also uncovered several weak areas, particularly in regard to working with sources and to adequately stating and supporting the purpose of the writing. We will be addressing these areas with additional instruction in the stand‐alone technical writing courses taken by engineering students. The process described in this paper could be helpful for other engineering programs preparing for ABET accreditation visits.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JEE711
ark:/67375/WNG-7724Q980-1
istex:ADE73E33534173A0F415930EF388D2A900431F78
Cathie Scott, Ph.C., is a doctoral student in Educational Communication and Technology at the University of Washington. During the course of her studies, she has served as the assistant director of the Engineering Writing Center and as a research assistant for the Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching. Her teaching experience includes introductory technical communication courses for engineering undergraduates and scientific‐technical editing courses for technical communication students.
Carolyn Plumb, Ph.D., is a senior lecturer in the Department of Technical Communication in the University of Washington's College of Engineering. She serves as Director of the College of Engineering's Communication Program, which provides communication courses to about 1,400 engineering students annually.
ISSN:1069-4730
2168-9830
DOI:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00711.x