Domestic Gardens Mitigate Risk of Exposure of Pollinators to Pesticides—An Urban-Rural Case Study Using a Red Mason Bee Species for Biomonitoring

• Published in: Sustainability Vol. 12; no. 22; p. 9427
• Main Authors: Šlachta, Martin, Erban, Tomáš, Votavová, Alena, Bešta, Tomáš, Skalský, Michal, Václavíková, Marta, Halešová, Taťána, Edwards-Jonášová, Magda, Včeláková, Renata, Cudlín, Pavel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 12.11.2020
• Subjects: Agricultural land; Bees; Biomonitoring; Contamination; Exposure; Food; Foraging habitats; Fruit trees; Fruits; Fungicides; Gardens; Gardens & gardening; Insecticides; Laboratories; Nesting; Nests; Oilseeds; Orchards; Pesticide residues; Pesticides; Plant nectar; Plant reproduction; Pollen; Pollinators; Provisions; Rape plants; Residues; Rural areas; Sustainability
• ISSN: 2071-1050; 2071-1050
• DOI: 10.3390/su12229427

Domestic gardens supply pollinators with valuable habitats, but the risk of exposure to pesticides has been little investigated. Artificial nesting shelters of a red mason bee species (Osmia bicornis) were placed in two suburban gardens and two commercial fruit orchards to determine the contamination of forage sources by pesticides. Larval pollen provisions were collected from a total of 14 nests. They consisted mainly of pollen from oaks (65–100% weight/sample), Brassicaceae (≤34% w/s) and fruit trees (≤1.6% w/s). Overall, 30 pesticides were detected and each sample contained a mixture of 11–21 pesticide residues. The pesticide residues were significantly lower in garden samples than in orchard samples. The difference was attributed mainly to the abundant fungicides pyrimethanil and boscalid, which were sprayed in fruit orchards and were present on average at 1004 ppb and 648 ppb in orchard samples, respectively. The results suggested that pollinators can benefit from domestic gardens by foraging from floral sources less contaminated by pesticides than in adjacent croplands.