Public Perceptions of the Media Coverage of Irregular Immigration Comparative Insights From France, the United States, and Norway

• Published in: The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) Vol. 59; no. 7; pp. 839 - 857
• Main Authors: Beyer, Audun, Matthes, Jörg
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.06.2015; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Audiences; Citizens; Comparative analysis; Immigrants; Immigration; Mass media; Media coverage; Noncitizens; Norway; Offenses; Perceptions; Polls & surveys; Public opinion; Studies; Survey data; U.S.A; France; Norway; United States > US; irregular immigration; public opinion; comparative research; media evaluation
• ISSN: 0002-7642; 1552-3381
• DOI: 10.1177/0002764215573253

Irregular immigration has become a globally important topic. While there have been some studies on public opinion toward irregular immigration, virtually no studies have examined how audiences evaluate the media coverage of this issue. There is also a lack of comparative research. The aims of this article are to provide survey data on public opinion toward irregular immigration in the United States, France, and Norway as well as a comparative analysis of public perceptions of the news coverage. Findings suggest that irregular immigration remains a highly salient issue in public opinion in all three countries. Furthermore, public opinion is generally critical and skeptic toward irregular immigration and immigrants, and differences between countries regarding the coverage of the issue in national mainstream media do not necessarily seem to be mirrored in public opinion. The survey data also suggest that citizens in all three countries tend to believe that the negative aspects of irregular immigration such as crimes or border control receive too little coverage whereas perspectives more positive to irregular immigration receive too much. Implications for further comparative research on public opinion and media coverage are discussed.