Management of Green Intellectual Capital: Evidence-Based Literature Review and Future Directions

This paper presents a systematic, evidence-based review of Green Intellectual Capital (GIC) management, a construct first introduced in 2008 and increasingly recognized as a management concept in recent years. This review covers the literature on GIC from 2008 to 2020 and addresses the role played b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSustainability Vol. 13; no. 15; p. 8349
Main Authors Benevene, Paula, Buonomo, Ilaria, Kong, Eric, Pansini, Martina, Farnese, Maria Luisa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper presents a systematic, evidence-based review of Green Intellectual Capital (GIC) management, a construct first introduced in 2008 and increasingly recognized as a management concept in recent years. This review covers the literature on GIC from 2008 to 2020 and addresses the role played by intellectual capital as a framework to promote sustainability in organizations. With the aim of clarifying our knowledge on the application of the GIC paradigm, this paper reviews the findings on the outcomes achieved by organizations that adopt the GIC paradigm, the antecedents and possible mediation-moderation factors that enhance this process, and the contexts in which such outcomes emerge. Findings show that GIC offers a significant framework for promoting sustainability in organizations. However, even though this study underlines the increasing trend of GIC, there remains very little reliable data on the subject, particularly addressing the role played by GIC as a framework to promote sustainability in organizations. This literature review is valuable for both researchers and practitioners. From a theoretical point of view, it allows one to synthesize the outcomes of GIC to better delineate how it affects organizations and the environment. From a practical point of view, opening a debate about the actual outcomes of GIC allows one to overcome the theory–practice divide, making the value of GIC more accessible to practitioners and managers and pushing them to opt for a green shift in their organizations.
ISSN:2071-1050
2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su13158349