Spatio-Temporal Modeling of Small-Scale Ultrafine Particle Variability Using Generalized Additive Models

High-resolution measurements of ultrafine particle concentrations in ambient air are needed for the study of health human effects of long-term exposure. This work, carried out in the framework of the VIEPI project (Integrated Evaluation of Indoor Particulate Exposure), aims to extend current knowled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSustainability Vol. 14; no. 1; p. 313
Main Authors Gaeta, Alessandra, Leone, Gianluca, Di Menno di Bucchianico, Alessandro, Cusano, Mariacarmela, Gaddi, Raffaela, Pelliccioni, Armando, Reatini, Maria Antonietta, Di Bernardino, Annalisa, Cattani, Giorgio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:High-resolution measurements of ultrafine particle concentrations in ambient air are needed for the study of health human effects of long-term exposure. This work, carried out in the framework of the VIEPI project (Integrated Evaluation of Indoor Particulate Exposure), aims to extend current knowledge on small-scale spatio-temporal variability of Particle Number Concentration (PNC, considered a proxy of the ultrafine particles) at a local scale domain (1 km × 1 km). PNC measurements were made in the university district of San Lorenzo in Rome using portable condensation particle counters for 7 consecutive days at 21 sites in November 2017 and June 2018. Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) were performed in the area for winter, summer and the overall period. The log-transformed two-hour PNC averages constitute the response variable, and covariates were grouped by urban morphology, land use, traffic and meteorology. Winter PNC values were about twice the summer ones. PNC recorded in the university area were significantly lower than those observed in the external routes. GAMs showed a rather satisfactory result in order to capture the spatial variability, in accordance with those of other previous studies: variances were equal to 71.1, 79.7 and 84%, respectively, for winter, summer and the overall period.
ISSN:2071-1050
2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su14010313