Spatial Big Data Analysis of Political Risks along the Belt and Road

As many regions along the Belt and Road have long been struggling with terrorist attacks, crimes, wars, and corruption, political risks pose important challenges for infrastructure projects and transnational investment. The objective of the article is to contribute to the identification of different...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSustainability Vol. 11; no. 8; p. 2216
Main Authors Zhang, Chuchu, Xiao, Chaowei, Liu, Helin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 12.04.2019
Subjects
21st century
Bivariate analysis
Construction industry
Corruption
Datasets
Globalization
Literature reviews
Political factors
Political power
Political risk
Political science
Politics
Project engineering
Risk assessment
Roads
Spatial analysis
Spatial data
Spatial distribution
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Sustainable development
China
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:As many regions along the Belt and Road have long been struggling with terrorist attacks, crimes, wars, and corruption, political risks pose important challenges for infrastructure projects and transnational investment. The objective of the article is to contribute to the identification of different types of political risks along the Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road, and the visualization of their micro-level spatial distribution based on the Global Database of Events, Language, and Tone (GDELT) datasets from October 2013 to May 2018. By adopting the bivariate Moran’s I model to compare the distribution of political risks along the Belt and Road and that of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) investment and construction projects based on data from the China Global Investment Tracker (CGIT), the article also generates an overall political risk profile for Chinese BRI projects. Our findings show that a particularly high percentage of Chinese BRI projects are distributed in regions with high political risks. This research has important implications for the discussion and study of the BRI. First, by combining geographic spatial statistical analysis and political science conceptual frameworks, we point out the necessity to query the BRI from interdisciplinary perspectives grounded in empirical research. Second, the research delivers to researchers, academics, practitioners, consultants and policy makers interested in the BRI the latest insights into the risks and challenges along the Belt and Road. Third, it advocates policies and strategies conducive to identifying, assessing and mitigating political risks in investment along the Belt and Road and to strengthening the sustainable development of the BRI.
ISSN:2071-1050
2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su11082216