A Difficult Pattern to Change in Romania, the Perspective of Socio-Economic Development

• Published in: Sustainability Vol. 14; no. 4; p. 2350
• Main Authors: Iancu, Tiberiu, Petre, Ionuț Laurențiu, Tudor, Valentina Constanta, Micu, Marius Mihai, Ursu, Ana, Teodorescu, Florina-Ruxandra, Dumitru, Eduard Alexandru
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.02.2022
• Subjects: Aging; Agricultural economics; Agricultural production; Agriculture; Cultural heritage; Economic development; Employment; Food security; Households; Infrastructure; Low income groups; Population; Rural areas; Sewer systems; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomics; Tourism; Town halls; Urban areas; Black Sea; Romania
• ISSN: 2071-1050; 2071-1050
• DOI: 10.3390/su14042350

The rural area is a basic component from a socio-economic point of view, being closely linked to the activities that take place in these areas. Normally, Romanian rural localities should show significant differences from one development region to another, being influenced by a number of factors (geographical positioning, the influence of agriculture in the economy, etc.). In this sense, data were collected from the town halls of the localities from Calarasi and Timis counties. The analyzed data were processed by the linear regression method, and the estimation of the evolution of the population was determined using the Vensim simulation program. The paper identifies a pattern in rural localities in Romania that hinders their development, reflected by various socio-economic indicators available in the analyzed localities. The main factor that can change this pattern in rural localities is the influence of local and national decision-makers, who can encourage investment in these areas either through the development of local and national infrastructure or through fiscal measures that encourage the development of quality non-agricultural activities that can generate financial resources and jobs at the local level. Moreover, it is not only the low number of non-agricultural activities that is causing the poor development of rural areas, but rather the low number of economic operators in general and the quality of these types of activities, which in most cases do not have the capacity to create new jobs.