From Tablet to Talmud: Canonised Knowledge in Late Antiquity
The article explores whether key features of Babylonian textual standardisation may have may have influenced basic patterns of text and commentary in the Babylonian Talmud. The paper takes the view that canonicity is a complex process involving different levels of standardising texts. On the whole,...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of ancient Near Eastern history Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 171 - 179 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Boston
De Gruyter
25.06.2021
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The article explores whether key features of Babylonian textual standardisation may have may have influenced basic patterns of text and commentary in the Babylonian Talmud. The paper takes the view that canonicity is a complex process involving different levels of standardising texts. On the whole, canonicity preserved major texts (like Gilgamesh, the Bible, the Hippocratic Corpus), but others considered as non-canonical (or ‘outside’) could still be used for explanatory purposes. The structure of the Babylonian Talmud (Mishnah, Gemara, Tosephta-based Beraitôt) serves as a useful model for comparison with earlier cuneiform compendia. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2328-9554 2328-9562 |
DOI: | 10.1515/janeh-2020-0011 |