Hadewijch: Mystic or theologian?

This article engages with the reception and naming of women by contemporary historians and theologians. The core question is as follows: when is a woman received as a theologian? This question is looked at via the works of Hadewijch, a 13th-century Flemish writer. Scholars easily group together wome...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHervormde teologiese studies Vol. 78; no. 2; pp. 1 - 8
Main Author Joubert, Lisel H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Portuguese
Afrikaans
Published AOSIS 07.07.2022
University of Pretoria
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article engages with the reception and naming of women by contemporary historians and theologians. The core question is as follows: when is a woman received as a theologian? This question is looked at via the works of Hadewijch, a 13th-century Flemish writer. Scholars easily group together women from the High Middle Ages as mystics, referring to the experiential character of their theology and their writing in the vernacular. These criteria of gender, language and experience then disqualify them as theologians and qualify them as mystics. In this article, the dichotomy between spirituality and theology is revisited and examples of a growing discourse where Hadewijch and some of her contemporaries are called theologians are given. The genre of theology is then widened to recognise the worth not only of scholastic discourse but also of vision, poetry and bodily experience.Contribution The renaming of historical woman figures is of utmost importance in the understanding of what constitutes women theologians in the present day as well as for the healing of the divide between ‘spirituality’ and ‘theology’.
ISSN:0259-9422
2072-8050
2072-8050
DOI:10.4102/hts.v78i2.7574