‘The rules are all over the place’: Mass Observation, time, and law in the COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract This article analyses practices of pandemic time making that surrounded the imposition and communication of laws restricting daily life in parts of the United Kingdom in spring 2020. With colleagues, we commissioned a Mass Observation Project directive in summer 2020, asking contributors ab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of law and society Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 369 - 391
Main Authors BEYNON‐JONES, SIÂN, GRABHAM, EMILY, HENDRIE, NADINE
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract This article analyses practices of pandemic time making that surrounded the imposition and communication of laws restricting daily life in parts of the United Kingdom in spring 2020. With colleagues, we commissioned a Mass Observation Project directive in summer 2020, asking contributors about their everyday experience of time during the COVID‐19 pandemic. We analyse how legal temporalities emerge across 228 responses. Initially, law making seemed belated, missing the disruptive temporalities of the pandemic. Once they arrived, pandemic rules were sudden, changeable, and confusing. Mass Observation writers forged clusters of improvised practices – tactics of anticipation – to cope with these unsettling temporalities. Meanwhile, the Hansard Society, the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, and legal commentators argued that ‘fast‐track’ pandemic law making was error ridden, putting the public at risk of unwitting criminal liability. Attentive to ‘polyrhythmic’ temporalities operating across fields of experience and action, our study underlines the contradictory qualities of apparently resonant constructions of legal time.
ISSN:0263-323X
1467-6478
DOI:10.1111/jols.12446