Inequitable representation of Black boys in gifted and talented education, Advanced Placement, and special education

Abstract Black boys are overrepresented in special education (SPED) and underrepresented in gifted and talented education, Advanced Placement, and other opportunities for advanced learners. Conversely, they are overrepresented in SPED. In this article, we address the vicious cycle of deficit thinkin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Multicultural Counseling and Development Vol. 51; no. 4; pp. 304 - 314
Main Authors Ford, Donna Y., Hines, Erik M., Middleton, Tanya J., Moore, James L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2023
Subjects
Black people
Boys
Discrimination
Inequality
Prejudice
Racial discrimination
Racism
Special education
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Abstract Black boys are overrepresented in special education (SPED) and underrepresented in gifted and talented education, Advanced Placement, and other opportunities for advanced learners. Conversely, they are overrepresented in SPED. In this article, we address the vicious cycle of deficit thinking and intelligence test inequities—the consequences and impact on Black males. The impact of high‐stakes testing and racial prejudice and discrimination is stark. We present an equity formula to guide readers in all roles in setting quantifiable equity goals. Recommendations are provided.
ISSN:0883-8534
2161-1912
DOI:10.1002/jmcd.12283