Intraocular lens power calculation: angle κ and ocular biomechanics

Ocular biomechanics influence the refractive outcomes after IOL implantation. This study shows that eyes with softer biomechanics have more myopic prediction error. Purpose:To study the effect of ocular biomechanics on the prediction error of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.Setting:Centro H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cataract and refractive surgery Vol. 50; no. 4; pp. 345 - 351
Main Authors Marques, João Heitor, Baptista, Pedro Manuel, Ribeiro, Bruno, Menéres, Pedro, Beirão, João Melo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Maryland, MD Wolters Kluwer 01.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ocular biomechanics influence the refractive outcomes after IOL implantation. This study shows that eyes with softer biomechanics have more myopic prediction error. Purpose:To study the effect of ocular biomechanics on the prediction error of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.Setting:Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.Design:Prospective longitudinal study.Methods:This study included 67 subjects. Before cataract surgery subjects underwent biometry with IOLMaster 700 and biomechanical analysis with Corvis Scheimpflug technology. The targeted spherical equivalent was calculated with SRK-T and Barrett Universal II. Associations between prediction error (PE), absolute prediction error (AE), and biometric and biomechanical parameters were performed with stepwise multivariate linear correlation analysis.Results:Using the SRKT formula, there was association between PE and Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI, B = −0.531, P = .011) and between AE and the horizontal offset between the center of the pupil and the visual axis (angle κ, B = −0.274, P = .007). Considering the Barret Universal II formula, PE was independently associated with anterior chamber depth (B = −0.279, P = .021) and CBI (B = −0.520, P = .013) and AE was associated with angle κ (B = −0.370, P = .007).Conclusions:A large angle κ may reduce the predictability of IOL power calculation. Ocular biomechanics likely influence the refractive outcomes after IOL implantation. This study showed that eyes with softer corneal biomechanics had more myopic PE. This may relate to anteriorization of the effective lens position. Dynamic measurements may be the way to progress into future formulas.
Bibliography:Corresponding author: João Heitor Marques, MD, MSc, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal. Email: joaoheitormarques@gmail.com.Disclosures: None of the authors have any financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.First author:João Heitor Marques, MD, MScServiço de Oftalmologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0886-3350
1873-4502
1873-4502
DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001362