Cross-entropy based multi-objective uncertain portfolio selection problem

In most real life investment situations future security returns are represented mainly based on expert’s judgments due to the occurrence of unexpected incidents in economic and social changes or lack of historical data. In order to tackle such uncertainties, the returns of the securities are evaluat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of intelligent & fuzzy systems Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 4467 - 4483
Main Authors Kar, Mohuya B., Majumder, Saibal, Kar, Samarjit, Pal, Tandra
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2017
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In most real life investment situations future security returns are represented mainly based on expert’s judgments due to the occurrence of unexpected incidents in economic and social changes or lack of historical data. In order to tackle such uncertainties, the returns of the securities are evaluated by the experts instead of historical data. In this study, a multi-objective uncertain portfolio selection model has been proposed by defining average return as expected value, risk as variance and divergence among security returns as cross-entropy where the security returns are considered as uncertain variables. The transformed deterministic form of the proposed model is presented by considering security returns as linear uncertain variables. The deterministic model is then solved by using two multi-objective genetic algorithms (MOGAs), namely, Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Archive-Based hYbrid Scatter Search (AbYSS). We use a dataset from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange to illustrate the performance of the algorithms. Finally, a comparative study is performed in terms of certain performance matrices among NSGA-II and AbYSS.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1064-1246
1875-8967
DOI:10.3233/JIFS-169212