Packet Routing in Telecommunication Networks with Path and Flow Restrictions

We address packet-switched telecommunication networks, including ATM, SMDS, and X.25 services. We analyze important extensions of routing models by imposing restrictions on paths and flows. We then study how these modifications affect the computational requirements for solution. The restricted cases...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inINFORMS journal on computing Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 188 - 197
Main Authors LeBlanc, Larry J, Chifflet, Jerome, Mahey, Philippe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Linthicum INFORMS 01.05.1999
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We address packet-switched telecommunication networks, including ATM, SMDS, and X.25 services. We analyze important extensions of routing models by imposing restrictions on paths and flows. We then study how these modifications affect the computational requirements for solution. The restricted cases we examine are: 1) hop limits—the flow between each pair of nodes can take a maximum of h hops; 2) node and link capacity constraints—instead of traditional queuing delays, queuing is treated indirectly using penalty terms for "effective" capacity constraints; and 3) high- and low-priority flows—because of higher grade-of-service requirements for high-priority flows, additional capacity constraints are imposed on them. We discuss the importance of these restrictions and report results of computational testing using the flow-deviation algorithm. We also discuss the importance of limiting the number of routes used between node pairs and then analyze numerically how many distinct routes are typically used by the final solution from the flow-deviation algorithm when no route limits exist between node pairs.
ISSN:1091-9856
1526-5528
1091-9856
DOI:10.1287/ijoc.11.2.188