A model for compound action potentials and currents in a nerve bundle. III: A comparison of the conduction velocity distributions calculated from compound action currents and potentials

• Published in: Annals of biomedical engineering Vol. 19; no. 1; p. 97
• Main Authors: Wijesinghe, R S, Gielen, F L, Wikswo, Jr, J P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 1991
• Subjects: Action Potentials - physiology; Animals; Models, Neurological; Neural Conduction - physiology; Oligochaeta; Rana catesbeiana; Sciatic Nerve - physiology; Temperature
• ISSN: 0090-6964
• DOI: 10.1007/bf02368462

In this paper, we present the experimentally measured Compound Action Current (CACs) and Compound Action Potentials (CAPs) from frog sciatic nerves and earthworm nerve cords. We used histologically prepared cross sections of these nerve bundles to determine the distribution of fiber diameters. A modified volume conduction model that includes frequency-dependent conductivities was used to compute the Single Fiber Action Signals (SFASs). The recorded CACs and CAPs are used to predict the Conduction Velocity Distributions (CVDs) from the nerve bundles. The predicted CVDs are then compared with the histological CVDs. Analysis of Compound Action Signals from the three giant axons in the earthworm nerve cord and microelectrode data for the transmembrane action potential demonstrate the validity of our mathematical model. We found that the CVDs predicted from the recorded CACs and CAPs differ from the histological CVD for a variety of reasons. The validity of the assumption of a linear relationship between axon diameter and conduction velocity of a propagating action signal was investigated using CVDs from both the CAC and CAP. Variations of the CVDs with the propagation distance of the CASs and the recording temperature were investigated.