Comparative study of laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy in gastric cancer management

AIM:To compare long-term results of gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic and open gastrec-tomy in a single unit.METHODS:From February 2000 to September 2004,all patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach were assessed to entry in this longitudinal prospective non-randomized trial.Primary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 17; no. 41; pp. 4602 - 4606
Main Authors Sica, Giuseppe S, Iaculli, Edoardo, Biancone, Livia, Di Carlo, Sara, Scaramuzzo, Rosa, Fiorani, Cristina, Gentileschi, Paolo, Gaspari, Achille L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited 07.11.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIM:To compare long-term results of gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic and open gastrec-tomy in a single unit.METHODS:From February 2000 to September 2004,all patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach were assessed to entry in this longitudinal prospective non-randomized trial.Primary endpoint was cancer-related survival and secondary endpoints were overall survival,evaluation of surgical complications and mortality.RESULTS:Fifty-eight patients were enrolled.Forty-seven patients were followed-up(range 11-103,me-dian 38 mo).Four patients were lost at follow up.Twenty-two patients underwent a laparoscopic gastric surgery(LGS)and 25 had a standard open procedure(OGS).No statistical difference was found between the two groups in terms of 5 years cancer-related mortality rate(50% vs 52%,P = 1),and 5 years overall mortal-ity rate(54.5% vs 56%,P = 1).Accordingly,cancer-related and overall survival probability by Kaplan-Meier method showed comparable results(P = 0.81 and P = 0.83,respectively).We found no differences in surgical complications in the 2 groups.There was no conversion to open surgery in this series.CONCLUSION:LGS is as effective as OGS in the man-agement of advanced gastric cancer.However LGS can-not be recommended routinely over OGS for the treat-ment of advanced gastric cancer.
Bibliography:Advanced gastric cancer; Laparoscopy; Lap-aroscopic cancer surgery; Longterm outcomes; Survival
14-1219/R
AIM:To compare long-term results of gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic and open gastrec-tomy in a single unit.METHODS:From February 2000 to September 2004,all patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach were assessed to entry in this longitudinal prospective non-randomized trial.Primary endpoint was cancer-related survival and secondary endpoints were overall survival,evaluation of surgical complications and mortality.RESULTS:Fifty-eight patients were enrolled.Forty-seven patients were followed-up(range 11-103,me-dian 38 mo).Four patients were lost at follow up.Twenty-two patients underwent a laparoscopic gastric surgery(LGS)and 25 had a standard open procedure(OGS).No statistical difference was found between the two groups in terms of 5 years cancer-related mortality rate(50% vs 52%,P = 1),and 5 years overall mortal-ity rate(54.5% vs 56%,P = 1).Accordingly,cancer-related and overall survival probability by Kaplan-Meier method showed comparable results(P = 0.81 and P = 0.83,respectively).We found no differences in surgical complications in the 2 groups.There was no conversion to open surgery in this series.CONCLUSION:LGS is as effective as OGS in the man-agement of advanced gastric cancer.However LGS can-not be recommended routinely over OGS for the treat-ment of advanced gastric cancer.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Author contributions: Sica GS and Iaculli E designed and wrote the paper; Iaculli E and Scaramuzzo R did the statistical analysis; Scaramuzzo R, Fiorani C, Di Carlo S and Gentileschi P performed database and analysis of the results; Biancone L and Gaspari AL reviewed the paper and edited it.
Correspondence to: Dr. Giuseppe S Sica, MD, PhD, Department of Surgical Sciences, “Tor Vergata” University Hospital, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy. sica.giuseppe@fastwebnet.it
Telephone: +39-06-20902928 Fax: +39-06-20902926
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4602