Strategic Production and Trading in Renewable Energy Certificate Markets: Existence, Uniqueness, and Efficiency of Market Equilibria
As an incentive policy to promote renewable generation, the renewable standard portfolio (RPS) scheme has been widely adopted to enforce utility companies to procure a certain fraction of their energy supply from renewable sources. We construct a non-cooperative game theoretic model to study the str...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE transactions on network science and engineering Vol. 11; no. 6; pp. 5538 - 5548 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Piscataway
IEEE
01.11.2024
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | As an incentive policy to promote renewable generation, the renewable standard portfolio (RPS) scheme has been widely adopted to enforce utility companies to procure a certain fraction of their energy supply from renewable sources. We construct a non-cooperative game theoretic model to study the strategic behavior of utility companies in a renewable energy certificate (REC) market, where utility companies purchase REC from renewable producers to meet their RPS obligation. In the constructed game, each utility company makes the renewable production decisions so as to minimize its total cost (the sum of renewable production and RPS penalty costs). We establish mild conditions that guarantee the existence of a Nash equilibrium. We further prove that if a Nash equilibrium exists, it must be unique and minimize the system cost. When symmetric utility companies' energy loads are independent and identical Gaussian distributed, as the number of utility companies increases to infinity, we show that the expected cost (of a utility company) converges to a lower bound, the product of the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of renewable generation and its expected RPS obligation. Numerical studies on real-world (load, RPS requirement, penalty, and LCOE) data show that the REC trading can reduce 5%-10% of the system cost. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 2327-4697 2334-329X |
DOI: | 10.1109/TNSE.2023.3270632 |