Drunken Speech: The Impact of Dialect and Alcohol Intoxication on Mock Juror Perceptions of Sexual Assault Victims

ABSTRACT This study explored how alcohol intoxication and dialect influence mock jurors' perceptions of a sexual assault victim's credibility, blameworthiness, consent, verdicts and sentence length. A 2 × 2 between‐subjects design involved 198 participants (recruited from the community and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied cognitive psychology Vol. 39; no. 4
Main Authors Gawrylowicz, Julie, Kirk, Neil W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bognor Regis Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT This study explored how alcohol intoxication and dialect influence mock jurors' perceptions of a sexual assault victim's credibility, blameworthiness, consent, verdicts and sentence length. A 2 × 2 between‐subjects design involved 198 participants (recruited from the community and university campus) who read a fictional trial vignette, with the victim portrayed as either intoxicated or sober. Thereafter, they listened to an emergency call recorded by a bidialectal speaker, with the victim speaking either Scottish Standard English or the non‐standard Dundonian dialect. Although victims speaking Dundonian were perceived as less credible, dialect did not influence verdicts or sentencing decisions. Contrary to previous research, the victim's intoxication status did not affect mock jurors' decision‐making. These findings highlight the importance of addressing linguistic biases to ensure fair trial outcomes.
Bibliography:The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Funding
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0888-4080
1099-0720
DOI:10.1002/acp.70097