Postoperative Refractive Outcomes of Biometric Formulas in Phacovitrectomy with Gas Tamponade

• Published in: Korean journal of ophthalmology Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 322 - 327
• Main Authors: Choi, Yu-Jin, Jee, Donghyun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Korean Ophthalmological Society 01.08.2023; 대한안과학회
• Subjects: Original; 안과학; Vitrectomy; Phacoemulsification; Refractive errors; Intraocular lenses; Myopia
• ISSN: 1011-8942; 2092-9382
• DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2023.0012

To investigate the refractive accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for biometric formulas in phacovitrectomy. This retrospective study included 357 eyes of 357 patients who underwent phacovitrectomy using four commonly available IOL power formulas: Hoffer Q (87 eyes), Holladay 1 (78 eyes), Holladay 2 (91 eyes), and SRK/T (101 eyes). The mean refractive error (ME) and the mean absolute refractive error (MAE) were calculated based on the predicted postoperative refraction error, and they were compared using analysis of variance test. Subjects were divided into high myopic eyes (axial length, ≥26 mm) and nonhigh myopic eyes (axial length, <26 mm). The ME and the MAE after phacovitrectomy did not show a significant difference among the four IOL power formulas (p = 0.546 and p = 0.495, respectively). There was no significant statistical difference in formulas when the eyes were grouped into high myopia and nonhigh myopia (ME: p = 0.526 and p = 0.482, respectively; MAE: p = 0.715 and p = 0.627, respectively). The ME showed myopic shift in all formulas regardless of IOL formula used. The ME showed greater myopic shift in high myopia group than nonhigh myopia group in all formulas. Our study did not find evidence for superiority of any formula in phacovitrectomy. However, in phacovitrectomy, possible myopic shift should be considered for IOL power calculation. Especially, in phacovitrecotmy in patients with high myopia, more myopic shift should be considered when selecting IOL.