Biospecimen Data Reporting in the Research Literature

• Published in: Biopreservation and biobanking Vol. 17; no. 4; p. 326
• Main Authors: Meredith, Anna J, Simeon-Dubach, Daniel, Matzke, Lise A, Cheah, Stefanie, Watson, Peter H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.08.2019
• Subjects: Biological Specimen Banks; Biomedical Research; Humans; Quality Control; Research Design; research reproducibility; biobanking; human biospecimens; sustainability; preanalytical variation; quality
• ISSN: 1947-5543
• DOI: 10.1089/bio.2018.0143

A substantial fraction of biomedical research depends on the reliability of human biospecimens but variations in sample manipulation during collection, processing, and storage can differentially alter molecular integrity and influence interpretation of the resulting derived data. Details of biobanking processes are rarely adequately described in research publications, preventing reviewers, readers, and scientists seeking to replicate the findings, from appreciating and adequately considering preanalytical variations contributing to results. To address these shortcomings, a set of reporting guidelines, the Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality (BRISQ) criteria, were developed in 2011. In this study we evaluated the uptake and reporting of BRISQ criteria in 324 articles across four leading biomedical journals using human biospecimens and published before (161; in 2010) and after (163; in 2014) the delineation of the BRISQ guidelines. We found that even within journals recommending use of BRISQ, manuscript-level uptake. and reporting of the relevant biospecimen information is not widespread or uniform. In the future, an enhanced biospecimen reporting strategy to better serve the needs of researchers, reviewers, and journals may be considered to strengthen research reproducibility for the benefit of the research community at large.