Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Expression of ErbB-4 in Prostate Cancer

To evaluate cytoplasmic and nuclear ErbB-4 expression in prostate cancer specimens and its association with outcome. Specimens of 50 prostate cancer patients were investigated for ErbB-4 overexpression using Immunohistochemistry staining. Cytoplasmic and nuclear staining was graded as 0-3 according...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe International journal of biological markers Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 181 - 185
Main Authors Ben-Yosef, R., Sarid, D., Vexler, A., Lidawi, G., Inbar, M., Marmor, S., Starr, A., Hahoshen, N. Yaal
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Milano Wichtig 01.07.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate cytoplasmic and nuclear ErbB-4 expression in prostate cancer specimens and its association with outcome. Specimens of 50 prostate cancer patients were investigated for ErbB-4 overexpression using Immunohistochemistry staining. Cytoplasmic and nuclear staining was graded as 0-3 according to its intensity. The prognostic parameters were tumor stage, PSA level, Gleason score, probability of positive lymph nodes (Partin's tables and Roach equation), and 5-year disease free survival (Kattan nomogram). Overexpression of ErbB-4 (> or = 1) was detected in 30 (60%) patients and overexpression using cytoplasmic and nuclear staining was > or = 2 in 19 (38%) and 17 (34%) patients, respectively. In only one third of the specimens was there any similarity between the 2 types of staining. Advanced tumor stage, high pretreatment PSA levels and high Gleason scores were evenly distributed among the patients with low (< or = 1) and intermediate/high (> or = 2) ErbB-4 expression. The probability of lymph node involvement and 5-year disease free survival were similar in both types of staining. ErbB-4 was overexpressed (cytoplasmic and nuclear staining) in approximately one third of prostate cancer patients. The rate of similarity between the 2 staining types was only 33%: overexpression was evenly distributed among intermediate/high and low risk prostate cancer patients with both staining methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0393-6155
1724-6008
DOI:10.1177/172460080702200303