Polarimetric SAR Image Classification Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Deep convolutional neural networks have achieved great success in computer vision and many other areas. They automatically extract translational-invariant spatial features and integrate with neural network-based classifier. This letter investigates the suitability and potential of deep convolutional...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters Vol. 13; no. 12; pp. 1935 - 1939 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Piscataway
IEEE
01.12.2016
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Deep convolutional neural networks have achieved great success in computer vision and many other areas. They automatically extract translational-invariant spatial features and integrate with neural network-based classifier. This letter investigates the suitability and potential of deep convolutional neural network in supervised classification of polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (POLSAR) images. The multilooked POLSAR data in the format of coherency or covariance matrix is first converted into a normalized 6-D real feature vector. The six-channel real image is then fed into a four-layer convolutional neural network tailored for POLSAR classification. With two cascaded convolutional layers, the designed deep neural network can automatically learn hierarchical polarimetric spatial features from the data. Two experiments are presented using the AIRSAR data of San Francisco, CA, and Flevoland, The Netherlands. Classification result of the San Francisco case shows that slant built-up areas, which are conventionally mixed with vegetated area in polarimetric feature space, can now be successfully distinguished after taking into account spatial features. Quantitative analysis with respect to ground truth information available for the Flevoland test site shows that the proposed method achieves an accuracy of 92.46% in classifying the considered 15 classes. Such results are comparable with the state of the art. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1545-598X 1558-0571 |
DOI: | 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2618840 |