Researchers' Perspectives Regarding Ethical Issues of Biobank Research in the Arab Region

• Published in: Biopreservation and biobanking Vol. 22; no. 2; p. 98
• Main Authors: Ibrahim, Maha E, Adarmouch, Latifa, Elgamri, Alya, Abd ElHafeez, Samar, Mohammed, Zeinab, Abdelgawad, Fatma, Elsebaie, Eman H, Abdelhafiz, Ahmed Samir, Gamel, Ehsan, El Rhazi, Karima, Abdelnaby, Asmaa, Ahram, Mamoun, Silverman, Henry
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.04.2024
• Subjects: biobanks; return of results; genomic research; data security; Research Ethics Committees; data sharing
• ISSN: 1947-5543
• DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0112

The recent expansion of genomic biobank research in the Arab region in the Middle East North Africa has raised complex ethical and regulatory issues. However, there is a lack of studies regarding the views of Arab researchers involved in such research. We aimed to assess the perceptions and attitudes of Arab researchers regarding these issues in biobank research. We developed a questionnaire to assess the perceptions and attitudes regarding genetic research of researchers from Egypt, Sudan, Morocco, and Jordan. The questionnaire requested demographic data, perceptions, and attitudes regarding the collection, storage, and use of biospecimens and data, the use of broad consent, data security, data sharing, and community engagement. We used multiple linear regressions to identify predictors of perceptions and attitudes. We recruited 383 researchers. Researchers favored equally the use of broad and tiered consent (44.1% and 39.1%, respectively). Most respondents agreed with the importance of confidentiality protections to ensure data security (91.8%). However, lower percentages were seen regarding the importance of community engagement (64.5%), data sharing with national colleagues and international partners (60.9% and 41.1%, respectively), and biospecimen sharing with national colleagues and international partners (59.9% and 36.2%, respectively). Investigators were evenly split on whether the return of individual research results should depend on the availability or not of a medical intervention that can be offered to address the genetic anomaly (47.5% and 46.4%, respectively). Predictors of attitudes toward biospecimen research included serving on Research Ethics Committees, prior research ethics training, and affiliation with nonacademic institutions. We recommend further exploratory research with researchers regarding the importance of community engagement and to address their concerns about data sharing, with researchers within and outside their countries.