Optimal Code Set Selection and Security Issues in Spectral Phase-Encoded Time Spreading (SPECTS) OCDMA Systems

In this paper, we perform a thorough analysis of a spectral phase-encoded time spreading optical code division multiple access (SPECTS-OCDMA) system based on Walsh-Hadamard (W-H) codes aiming not only at finding optimal code-set selections but also at assessing its loss of security due to crosstalk....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of lightwave technology Vol. 30; no. 12; pp. 1882 - 1890
Main Authors Bertarini, P. L. L., Sanches, A. L., Borges, B-H V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY IEEE 15.06.2012
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper, we perform a thorough analysis of a spectral phase-encoded time spreading optical code division multiple access (SPECTS-OCDMA) system based on Walsh-Hadamard (W-H) codes aiming not only at finding optimal code-set selections but also at assessing its loss of security due to crosstalk. We prove that an inadequate choice of codes can make the crosstalk between active users to become large enough so as to cause the data from the user of interest to be detected by other user. The proposed algorithm for code optimization targets code sets that produce minimum bit error rate (BER) among all codes for a specific number of simultaneous users. This methodology allows us to find optimal code sets for any OCDMA system, regardless the code family used and the number of active users. This procedure is crucial for circumventing the unexpected lack of security due to crosstalk. We also show that a SPECTS-OCDMA system based on W-H 32(64) fundamentally limits the number of simultaneous users to 4(8) with no security violation due to crosstalk. More importantly, we prove that only a small fraction of the available code sets is actually immune to crosstalk with acceptable BER (<;10 -9 ), i.e., approximately 0.5% for W-H 32 with four simultaneous users, and about 1 × 10 -4 % for W-H 64 with eight simultaneous users.
ISSN:0733-8724
1558-2213
DOI:10.1109/JLT.2012.2194986