Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

• Published in: Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume Vol. 96; no. 23; p. 1959
• Main Authors: Kim, Ho-Joong, Yi, Je-Min, Cho, Hyeon-Guk, Chang, Bong-Soon, Lee, Choon-Ki, Kim, Jee Hyoung, Yeom, Jin S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 03.12.2014
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Braces; Disability Evaluation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Fracture Fixation - instrumentation; Fractures, Compression - therapy; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae - injuries; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoporotic Fractures - therapy; Prospective Studies; Spinal Fractures - therapy; Thoracic Vertebrae - injuries; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1535-1386
• DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00187

The efficacy of brace application for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures with regard to whether the patients had no braces, rigid braces, or soft braces. We randomly assigned sixty patients with acute one-level osteoporotic compression fractures within three days of injury to the no-brace, soft-brace, and rigid-brace groups through 1:1:1 allocation. The primary outcome was the baseline adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score at twelve weeks after compression fracture. The non-inferior margin of the Oswestry Disability Index was set at an average of 10 points. The baseline adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score at twelve weeks after compression fracture in the no-brace group was not inferior to that in the soft-brace or rigid-brace groups. The mean adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score was 35.95 points (95% confidence interval, 25.42 to 46.47 points) in the no-brace group and 37.83 points (95% confidence interval, 26.77 to 48.90 points) in the soft-brace group, with a difference of -1.88 points (95% confidence interval, -7.02 to 9.38 points) between the groups. Similarly, the mean adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score was 35.95 points (95% confidence interval, 25.42 to 46.47 points) in the no-brace group and 33.54 points (95% confidence interval, 23.79 to 43.29 points) in the rigid-brace group, with a difference of 2.41 points (95% confidence interval, -7.86 to 9.27 points) between the groups. During the follow-up assessment period, there was no significant difference among the groups for the overall Oswestry Disability Index scores (p = 0.260), visual analog scale for pain scores for back pain (p = 0.292), and anterior body compression ratios (p = 0.237). However, the Oswestry Disability Index scores and the visual analog scale scores for back pain significantly improved with time after the fractures (p < 0.001), and the body compression ratios significantly decreased with time in all three groups (p < 0.001). The Oswestry Disability Index scores for the treatment of compression fractures without a brace were not inferior to those with soft or rigid braces. Moreover, the improvement in back pain and progression of anterior body compression were similar among the three groups. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.