Seismic performance analysis of BRBs and gussets in a full‐scale 2‐story BRB‐RCF specimen

• Published in: Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics Vol. 47; no. 12; pp. 2366 - 2389
• Main Authors: Tsai, Ching‐Yi, Tsai, Keh‐Chyuan, Chen, Li‐Wei, Wu, An‐Chien
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bognor Regis Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 10.10.2018
• Subjects: Bracing; Buckling; buckling‐restrained brace; Computer simulation; Cyclic loading; Cyclic loads; Evaluation; finite element analysis; Finite element method; Forces (mechanics); frame action; Grout; gusset buckling; Limit states; Materials fatigue; Methods; Reinforced concrete; reinforced concrete frame; Reinforcement (structures); Reinforcing steels; Seismic activity; Seismic analysis; Seismic engineering; Seismic response; Seismic stability; Stability analysis; Steel
• ISSN: 0098-8847; 1096-9845
• DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3073

Summary The implementation of buckling‐restrained braces (BRBs) for new reinforced concrete frame (RCF) constructions is limited. This study investigates the seismic forces and stability in the BRBs and gussets of a 2‐story full‐scale RCF specimen by using Abaqus models and a newly proposed stability evaluation method. The hybrid and cyclic loading test results are accurately predicted by the Abaqus analyses. Existing methods for computing the gusset interface forces for steel buildings from both the brace and the frame actions are compared with the Abaqus results. The applicability of these methods for the BRB‐RCF design is critically evaluated. It is confirmed that the Parallel‐2 method is suitable for estimating the BRB force demand imposed on the corner gusset and the generalized uniform force method is good for the corner gusset at the base. In addition, existing stability evaluation methods for BRBs and gussets are applied to investigate the out‐of‐plane (OOP) buckling of the first‐story BRB observed at the end of tests. The proposed stability model incorporates the BRB restrainer's flexural effects and 4 rotational springs in assessing the BRB's buckling. This model confirms that the BRB and the gusset's OOP buckling limit states could be coupled and must be evaluated together. By incorporating the flexural effects of the steel casing and the infilled grout, the proposed model satisfactorily predicts the OOP buckling of the first‐story BRB and gussets. These research results can be used for the implementation of BRBs in new RC frame constructions.