Evidence‐based fault tree analysis of the hydraulic system in CNC machine tools

The hydraulic system is an integral part of CNC machine tools. In analyzing the reliability of machine tool hydraulic systems, their failures are influenced by both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. This paper utilizes the fault tree analysis method to address failure modes subject to epistemic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inQuality and reliability engineering international Vol. 40; no. 6; pp. 3141 - 3160
Main Authors Chen, Hong‐Xia, Xie, Sui‐Xin, Zhang, Jun‐Feng, Chen, Wang‐Hao, Niu, Bo, Zhang, Jiao‐Teng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bognor Regis Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The hydraulic system is an integral part of CNC machine tools. In analyzing the reliability of machine tool hydraulic systems, their failures are influenced by both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. This paper utilizes the fault tree analysis method to address failure modes subject to epistemic uncertainty, using the interval rough number scoring method to evaluate the probability of such failures occurring. The resulting reliability calculation is termed as “subjective reliability”. For failure modes influenced by aleatory uncertainty, objective data combined with the Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is used to determine their failure probability, with the corresponding reliability calculation referred to as “objective reliability”. Finally, a comprehensive calculation of both subjective and objective reliability is conducted to determine the overall reliability of the hydraulic system, along with the ranking of the importance of basic events of fault tree. This methodology covers scenarios with small samples, sufficient data, and their combinations, offering extensive application prospects.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0748-8017
1099-1638
DOI:10.1002/qre.3581